[BNM] Dreamhost, 34sp or Media Temple?

[Joe Aliferis]

it seems that this whole discussion points towards the already known 
fact that 'you get what you pay for' - when it comes to hosting.

allowing for a few exceptions of course

joe




Mark Ng wrote:
> On 28/11/2007, delarge <delargerock at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have heard of others having a spot of trouble, but just as is the case
>> with any hosting company that big - but I can say that I have never had a
>> problem - my package runs nearly 20 sites, I get downtime now and again but
>> rarely longer than 10minutes - and the price makes me forget about that
>> quite quickly.
> 
> Don't get me wrong, the package is fantastic value for money - I'm
> just offering a counterpoint to the "wow, they rule !!!" point of
> view.  Even knowing the reliability issues I've had, I'd still keep
> the account (and renew it) - but then again I use it for backup and
> SVN, not to run any sites from.
> 
>> They do respond to emails quite quickly and there is always
>> http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/
> 
> Yes, there is, and unlike most ISPs and hosts, they do actually admit
> there is a problem when there is one.