[BNM] [OT] Conspiracy solved

[joe aliferis]

i heard that report too

I think it was shot down - simply because the crash site is spread over 
a couple of miles - not plane coming down in the way it is supposed to 
would have its parts spread over such a large area - crash history shows 
that clearly.

On the other hand, a plane hit by an air to air missle would break apart 
in the air and come down over a large area

joe


james wrote:

>If they were trying to counter any conspiracy theories I'm not sure why they 
>bothered as you can't see the plane at all!
>
>I was at work when the events of 911 unfolded. It was a new media company so 
>everyone had fast Internet access on their PCs obviously and knew lots of 
>different news sources to look at. We had a big telly on too. We were 
>calling out details to each other as things happened and we found bits of 
>news (there was about 10 of us in the office). I distinctly remember a 
>colleague Dave who sat opposite calling out to us all, "Oh my God, this 
>report says that US military have had to shoot down another hijacked plane 
>somewhere over Pennsylvania." A couple of people jumped up and read the same 
>news report, I didn't.
>
>I never heard that news again ... I guess it never happened.
>
>Jim.
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Tom Coady" <tom.coady at gmail.com>
>To: "Brighton New Media" <bnmlist at brightonnewmedia.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:40 AM
>Subject: [BNM] [OT] Conspiracy solved
>
>
>Glad it's all been cleared up now.
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4988022.stm
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4987716.stm
>I specially like the handy real video made by Aunty.
>Party line carefully shrouded in faux impartiality, eg
>concluding with Gov case that disproves the paranoid.
>
>  
>